The evaluation report from the meeting in Lublin has been posted under “Meetings” and also under “Evaluation”. Direct link: Evaluation of meeting in Lublin.
It seems that the partnership is proceeding very well, and a majority of participants are happy with the atmosphere and quality of cooperation!
On average, everything was rated very positively. If there is something to be learned and/or changed for future meetings, it is perhaps the format of reporting the work done. Any suggestions?